Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 54, Number 3 (April 2001)

---

 

SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES - The John W. Wade Conference on the Third Restatement of Torts

John C. P. Goldberg, Introduction, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 639 (2001).

I. DUTY AND THE STRUCTURE OF NEGLIGENCE

John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipurski, The Restatement (Third) and the Place of Duty in Negligence Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 657 (2001).

Martha Chamallas, Removing Emotional Harm from the Core of Tort Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 751 (2001).

David Owen, Duty Rules, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 767 (2001).

Robert L. Rabin, The Duty Concept in Negligence Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 787 (2001).

Ernest J. Weinrib, The Passing of Palsgraf?, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 803 (2001).

II. FAULT

Stephen G. Gilles, On Determining Negligence: Hand Formula Balancing, the Reasonable Person Standard, and they Jury, 54 Vand. L.Rev. 813 (2001).

Steven Hetcher, Non-Utilitarian Negligence Norms and the Reasonable Person Standard, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 863 (2001).

Stephen R. Perry, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Negligence Standard, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 893 (2001).

Kenneth W. Simons, The Hand Formula in the Draft Restatement (Third) of Torts: Encompassing Fairness as well as Efficiency Values, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 901 (2001).

III. PROXIMATE CAUSE

Jane Stapleton,Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 941 (2001).

Mark Geistfeld, Scientific Uncertainty and Causation in Tort Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1011 (2001).

Patrick J. Kelley, Restating Duty, Breach, and Proximate Cause in Negligence Law: Descriptive Theory and the Rule of Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1039 (2001).

Richard W. Wright, Once More Into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal Responsibility, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1071 (2001).

IV. INTENT

James A. Henderson, Jr., Aaron D. Twerski, Intent and Recklessness in Tort: The Practical Craft of Restating Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1133 (2001).

Jody David Armour, Interpretive Construction, Systematic Consistency, and Criterial Norms in Tort Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1157 (2001).

Anthony J. Sebok, Purpose, Belief, and Recklessness: Pruning the Restatement (Third)'s Definition of Intent, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1165 (2001).

V. THE HISTORY AND DIRECTION OF NEGLIGENCE

Kenneth S. Abraham, The Trouble with Negligence, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1187 (2001).

Thomas C. Grey, Accidental Torts, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1225 (2001).

Gregory C. Keating, The Theory of Enterprise Liability and Common Law Strict Liability, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1285 (2001).

G. Edward White, The Unexpected Persistence of Negligence, 1980-2000, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1337 (2001).

VI. PERSPECTIVE ON THE THIRD RESTATEMENT

Anita Bernstein, Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles and the Prescription of Masculine Order, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1367 (2001).

Keith N. Hylton, The Theory of Tort Doctrine and the Restatement (Third) of Torts, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1413 (2001).

Jack B. Weinstein, The Restatement of Torts and the Courts, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1439 (2001).

Catharine Pierce Wells, A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Tort Law, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1447 (2001).